Begin typing your search...

IndiGo and Mahindra Lock Horns Over 6E Trademark Rights in Delhi High Court

In a legal face-off between InterGlobe Aviation Ltd (IndiGo) and Mahindra Electric Automobile Ltd over the use of the "6E" trademark, the Delhi High Court deferred the matter to April 2025 for a final hearing.

IndiGo and Mahindra Lock Horns Over 6E Trademark Rights in Delhi High Court

IndiGo and Mahindra Lock Horns Over 6E Trademark Rights in Delhi High Court
X

9 Dec 2024 4:51 PM IST

Mahindra, in response to IndiGo's trademark infringement claims, agreed to refrain from using the "6E" branding for its BE 6E electric vehicle until the case is resolved.

During the hearing, Justice Mini Pushkarna recorded Mahindra's undertaking to temporarily discontinue the use of the "BE 6E" name. The company informed the court that it had renamed the vehicle as "BE 6" on December 7, highlighting its intent to contest IndiGo's claims on merit.

Justice Pushkarna noted, "Mahindra has voluntarily renamed its vehicle and shall not use the disputed term until the matter is resolved." The court acknowledged IndiGo's plea and instructed both parties to complete pleadings before the April 2025 hearing.

IndiGo, a leading airline operating under the callsign "6E," claims the trademark is a key element of its branding and customer services. Registered under multiple categories since 2015, including advertising, transportation, and printed materials, the "6E" trademark represents IndiGo's strong market presence.

On November 25, the Registrar of Trademarks approved Mahindra Electric's application to register "BE 6E" under Class 12, covering motor vehicles and their components. This approval, contested by IndiGo, led the airline to initiate legal action, arguing that Mahindra's use of "6E" could dilute its brand identity.

IndiGo filed the suit after Mahindra unveiled its electric vehicle BE 6E, positioning it within the expanding EV segment. The case first appeared before Justice Amit Bansal, who recused himself on December 3, leading to its reassignment.

The dispute has garnered significant attention as it involves two prominent players from the airline and automotive sectors. Mahindra, a major automobile manufacturer, has publicly stated its intent to defend the use of "BE 6E" while complying with the interim directives.

IndiGo was represented by senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Sandeep Sethi, alongside advocates Aditya Gupta, Mukul Kocchar, and Chhavi Tokas from Ira Law. Mahindra's legal team was led by senior advocate Chander M. Lall.

IndiGo Mahindra Trademark Delhi High Court BE 6E electric vehicle Mini Pushkarna Mukul Rohatgi Sandeep Sethi Aditya Gupta Mukul Kocchar Chhavi Tokas Chander M. Lall 
Next Story
Share it