BRH case: SAT quashes Sebi order against HDFC
HDFC was justified in invoking the pledge made by the broker BRH, while invoking the pledge the bank did not violate any direction contained in Sebi's interim order, said SAT
image for illustrative purpose
Sebi passed interim order in October 2019 as HDFC invoked securities pledged by BRH Wealth Kreators
New Delhi: The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has quashed a Sebi order against HDFC Bank, whereby the regulator had imposed a penalty of Rs 1 crore on the lender in a case pertaining to invoking securities pledged by stockbroker BRH Wealth Kreators.
In addition, the regulator had directed to transfer Rs 158.68 crore along with seven per cent interest per annum into an escrow account till the issue of settlement of clients' securities is reconciled. These directions were issued by Sebi in January 2021 as HDFC Bank invoked securities pledged by BRH Wealth Kreators in violation of the regulator's interim order passed in October 2019. Following the Sebi's order, HDFC Bank moved to SAT. In its order on Friday, SAT said the bank was justified in invoking the pledge made by the broker BRH. While invoking the pledge the bank did not violate any direction contained in Sebi's interim order. "The appellant (HDFC Bank) could invoke the pledge under Depositories Act and is not required to approach any forum or Court of law for invocation of the pledge.
The assets of the broker do not include pledge of the shares created by the sub-broker," SAT said. The tribunal noted that the pledge was created by the broker BRH under the Depositories Act in favour of HDFC Bank. According to SAT, once a pledge is validly created by the broker in favour of the appellant (HDFC Bank) and the appellant is recorded as the beneficial owner in the records maintained by the depository, the beneficial owner becomes the registered owner. Consequently, if a default is committed by the broker, the appellant gets a right to invoke the pledge under the agreement, it added. "Nothing has come on record to indicate that the invocation of the pledge by the appellant was wrongly done as there was no default committed by the broker," SAT said. Accordingly, the tribunal said that Sebi's order "cannot be sustained and is quashed".
