NJZ Trial Controversy: Attendee’s Review Gains 200K+ Views

A recent courtroom review from an attendee of the ongoing NJZ (NewJeans) trial has gained significant traction online, amassing over 200,000 views. The post included a photo of the attendee’s trial ticket and an account of the proceedings, sparking widespread debate.

The attendee detailed an exchange between Min Hee Jin and NJZ member Hanni regarding greetings. During the trial, messages between the two were discussed, including a conversation where Hanni was asked if she felt worse when Bang Si Hyuk ignored her. She reportedly responded that she was indifferent because she always sensed his dislike. Min Hee Jin’s reply to Hanni, expressing affection and stating that she was special, was described as unexpected.

The attendee suggested that the nature of the messages resembled manipulation but noted that the details had not been widely reported in the media. Filming was prohibited during the trial, but the attendee’s impressions led them to perceive the situation as an example of gaslighting.

Another attendee shared their reaction to the members’ conduct in court. A key moment involved Danielle, who referenced NJZ as a six-member group while delivering a statement. The judge had requested a brief statement from a single representative, yet each member reportedly spoke individually. Additionally, while the judge was making final remarks, one member allegedly interrupted, asking to add another comment, altering the courtroom atmosphere. The attendee questioned the reasoning behind the members’ presence at the trial, implying that their participation seemed unusual.

Following these revelations, online discussions intensified, with netizens criticizing the group’s behavior. Screenshots of online reactions surfaced, highlighting concerns about the courtroom interruptions and past incidents involving the group’s public statements.

Some online users expressed their disappointment, recalling a previous moment when NJZ members interrupted a ‘Music Bank’ host to express their support for the CEO. Comments on various platforms suggested that the group’s courtroom actions could have lasting consequences.

Responses varied, with some netizens feeling that NJZ had reached an irreversible point in their controversy, while others defended certain members, notably Haerin and Danielle. Some users speculated about the difficulty the judge faced in managing the trial and questioned whether the group was deliberately challenging the court’s authority.

The final statements made by the group during the trial have continued to fuel discussions, with many interpreting their words as an attempt at narrative control. As reactions spread online, the controversy surrounding NJZ’s trial participation shows no signs of subsiding.